Call for Papers
Publish rigorous negative results and replication studies that improve scientific integrity.
Journal at a Glance
ISSN: 2641-9181
DOI Prefix: 10.14302/issn.2641-9181
License: CC BY 4.0
Peer reviewed open access journal
Scope Alignment
Negative results, null findings, replication studies, methodological transparency, and reproducibility across disciplines. We prioritize rigorous reporting and complete outcomes.
Publishing Model
Open access, single blind peer review, and rapid publication after acceptance and production checks. Metadata validation and DOI registration are included.
International Journal of Negative Results invites submissions that report negative, null, or inconclusive results across scientific disciplines. We welcome rigorous studies that challenge assumptions, test replication, or document unexpected outcomes that advance knowledge.
Our editorial focus prioritizes methodological transparency, complete outcome reporting, and clear interpretation of null findings.
- Replication studies and reproducibility assessments
- Null results in clinical trials or observational studies
- Non-confirmatory findings in laboratory research
- Negative outcomes in engineering or computational methods
- Unexpected results in social and behavioral sciences
- Methodological papers reporting failed approaches
- Meta-analyses including unpublished negative findings
- Bias reduction and publication transparency research
- Protocol deviations and learning from null outcomes
- Data-driven reviews of null or inconclusive evidence
- Negative findings in AI, modeling, or algorithm performance
- Inconclusive results with strong methodological rigor
Original Research
Well designed studies reporting negative or null outcomes with full data.
Systematic Reviews
Evidence syntheses that include null or non-confirmatory findings.
Methods and Tools
Analytical or experimental methods with lessons from failed approaches.
- Replication studies and validation reports
- Short communications of rigorous negative results
- Registered reports and confirmatory protocols
- Policy or perspective pieces on publication bias
Successful submissions provide a clear hypothesis, robust methodology, and transparent reporting of null outcomes. We value studies that explain why negative results are informative and how they refine future research directions.
Authors should document protocols, statistical power, and limitations so results can be interpreted with confidence.
- Clear hypotheses and predefined outcomes
- Transparent statistical analysis and confidence intervals
- Complete reporting of all outcomes and deviations
- Interpretation that links null results to field advancement
Open Access Visibility
Negative results reach global researchers and policy leaders.
Single Blind Peer Review
Expert reviewers evaluate rigor and transparency.
Metadata and DOI Support
Structured metadata improves discoverability and reuse.
Bias Reduction
Your work counters publication bias and improves meta-analysis.
Submissions undergo editorial screening for scope fit, methodological rigor, and reporting completeness. Qualified manuscripts move to single blind peer review with subject matter experts.
| Stage | Typical Timing | Focus |
|---|---|---|
| Initial Screening | 1 to 2 weeks | Scope fit and compliance checks |
| Peer Review | 3 to 6 weeks | Methodology rigor and transparency |
| Revision | 2 to 4 weeks | Author responses and refinements |
| Production | 2 to 3 weeks | Copyediting, proofs, DOI registration |
IJNR operates under an open access model to ensure negative results research is discoverable and reusable. APCs are applied after acceptance and support peer review, production, and archiving services.
Membership options and affordable APC waivers are available for eligible authors. Contact the editorial office at [email protected] for guidance.
Do you accept replication studies?
Yes. Replication and validation studies are encouraged.
Are preprints allowed?
Yes. Disclose preprints in the cover letter and cite them appropriately.
Can I submit inconclusive results?
Yes. Inconclusive outcomes with strong methods are welcome.
How do I propose a special issue?
Send a proposal outline to [email protected] for review.
IJNR is committed to rigorous, transparent publishing of negative, null, and inconclusive results. We emphasize reproducible methods, full outcome reporting, and ethical compliance across all article types.
The editorial office supports authors, editors, and reviewers with clear guidance and responsive communication. For questions about scope or workflow, contact [email protected].
We encourage complete reporting, data availability, and candid discussion of limitations to strengthen the research record.
Ready to Submit to IJNR?
Share negative or null findings with a global, open access audience.