Original research articles
Experimental, analytical, computational, clinical, observational and pharmacy-practice studies addressing a defined pharmaceutical question.
Manuscript preparation · JAPST
Use these requirements to prepare the manuscript file, pharmaceutical evidence, figures, declarations, references and submission package.
Release profile
Confirm subject fit, originality, authorship and the article type before preparing the final files.
A submission should make a clear contribution to pharmaceutical knowledge, technology, medicine safety or pharmacy practice. A new formulation or manufacturing process is not required for every study.
The manuscript must not be under consideration by another journal. Disclose any preprint and explain material changes made after posting.
Confirm that every author meets the journal's contribution and accountability requirements, approves the submitted version and agrees to the author order.
Choose the type that matches the scholarly contribution; every type must remain within the journal scope.
Experimental, analytical, computational, clinical, observational and pharmacy-practice studies addressing a defined pharmaceutical question.
Critical narrative reviews, focused reviews, systematic reviews and meta-analyses with a clear question, transparent methods and balanced interpretation.
Well-documented cases concerning adverse drug reactions, interactions, medication errors, pharmacotherapy or pharmaceutical care, with appropriate consent and cautious interpretation.
Concise reports of a focused finding or method, with enough evidence to support the stated contribution.
Pharmaceutical methods or study protocols with a clear rationale, sufficient methodological detail and evaluation appropriate to their purpose.
Evidence-based scholarly discussion of pharmaceutical science, technology, regulation, medicine use or pharmacy practice.
| Article type | Word guidance | Abstract and keywords |
|---|---|---|
| Original research | 6,000–8,000 words | Structured abstract, up to 250 words; 5–12 keywords |
| Review article | 8,000–10,000 words | Structured abstract, up to 250 words; 5–12 keywords |
| Short communication or technical note | 2,500–3,500 words | Abstract up to 250 words; 5–12 keywords |
| Method or protocol | 4,000–6,000 words | Abstract up to 250 words; 5–12 keywords |
| Case report | Concise account focused on the case and its pharmaceutical significance | Abstract up to 250 words; 5–12 keywords |
| Perspective, commentary or policy analysis | Length proportionate to the argument | Concise abstract up to 250 words; 5–12 keywords |
Word guidance excludes references, tables and figure legends.
Use a clear structure suited to the article type and provide enough detail for editorial assessment and independent review.
DOCX is preferred. Use a 12-point readable font, double spacing, 1-inch margins, page numbers and continuous line numbering where possible.
Use a title of no more than 30 words and a running title of up to 60 characters. Include complete author names, affiliations, corresponding-author contact details and ORCID iDs where available.
Use Background, Methods, Results and Conclusion headings for research studies. Adapt the abstract to the case or review format where appropriate. Define abbreviations and provide 5–12 precise keywords.
Original research, including clinical and observational studies, normally uses Introduction, Materials and Methods, Results, Discussion and Conclusion. Case reports should include context, patient information, a clinical timeline, medicine exposure or intervention, outcomes and discussion. Reviews should state their question and approach to selecting and evaluating evidence. Include declarations and references.
Use SI units, define abbreviations, use generic drug names first and apply standard gene, protein and chemical nomenclature.
State the article type, central pharmaceutical contribution, originality, prior dissemination, conflicts and any ethics or trial-registration information.
Report the information relevant to the study type; requirements should support evaluation and reproducibility without forcing irrelevant fields.
Report quantities, grades, critical material attributes, preparation sequence, controls and characterization needed to understand and reproduce the product.
State intended use, calibration and range, accuracy, precision, selectivity or specificity, sensitivity and robustness or stability evidence as applicable.
State storage conditions, packaging where relevant, sampling intervals, acceptance criteria and the stability-indicating methods used.
Describe design, dosing, sampling, analytical methods and key parameters in relation to exposure, drug response, safety, bioavailability or the study question.
Identify suppliers or manufacturers, catalog or lot identifiers where relevant, and authentication for biological materials and cell lines.
Report equipment and scale, critical process parameters, critical quality attributes and controls sufficient for evaluation and reproduction.
Drug or target identity, dose and exposure, assay suitability, controls, selectivity, response measures and the limits of mechanistic or therapeutic claims.
Authenticated source material, extraction and characterization, batch or constituent information, appropriate biological controls and evidence for safety and activity.
Population, medicine exposure or pharmacy intervention, relevant outcomes, confounding, ethics, consent and transparent interpretation of associations.
For cases, report the clinical timeline, medicine exposure, alternative explanations and required consent. For computation, report data provenance, evaluation, validation and limitations.
Methods, visual evidence and policy declarations must be complete and internally consistent.
Use the applicable reporting guidance, including CONSORT, STROBE, PRISMA, CARE, STARD or ARRIVE. The EQUATOR Network provides the current guideline library.
Include author contributions, funding and sponsor role, competing interests, data and code availability, material provenance, ethics approval, consent and clinical-trial registration where applicable.
Peer review: Single-blind by default; double-blind review is available on request.
For double-blind review, remove author names, affiliations, acknowledgments, funding details, institution names, and other identifying information from the reviewer manuscript. Provide identifying information separately in the title-page file or submission form.
Use Vancouver style, number sources in order of citation and include DOI links where available.
| Source | Required order |
|---|---|
| Journal article | Author surname and initials. Article title. Journal title. Year;volume(issue):pages. DOI. |
| Book or chapter | Author surname and initials. Chapter title. In: Book title. Edition. City: Publisher; year. Pages. |
| Web page | Organization or author. Page title. Site title. Update date. URL. Access date. |
| Dataset | Creator. Dataset title. Repository; version, year. DOI or persistent identifier. |
| Preprint | Author. Manuscript title. Preprint server. Year. DOI or persistent URL. Identify as a preprint. |
| Trial registration | Registry. Registered study title. Identifier. Registration date. Persistent URL. |
Patil NS, Suryawanshi HS, Shaikh AZ, Pawar SP. A Review on Drug Design by the Application of Computer. J Adv Pharm Sci Technol. 2022;3(1):13–17. doi:10.14302/issn.2328-0182.japst-22-4363.
Use one approved route for the manuscript and respond to any revision request against the decision letter.
The decision letter states the revision deadline and required response. Address every reviewer and editor point, provide a point-by-point response and submit clean or marked files as requested.
The article processing charge is invoiced only after acceptance. Authors review the proof, and the final article is published under CC BY 4.0. See the APC page, Copyright and License page and Indexing and Discoverability page for the authoritative terms.
Submit and manage the manuscript in the publisher's editorial system.
Open ManuscriptZoneUse the publisher's manuscript submission form.
Open submission formEmail the manuscript and supporting files to [email protected].
Email the editorial officeAuthors must use only one submission route for the same manuscript.